Archive

Archive for November, 2010

Landlord Liability and Violations of the Building Code

November 30th, 2010 1 comment

In a recent post, I discussed the foolishness of owners who don’t fix their rental property and end up facing civil liability judgments that could have been avoided if they had just followed the fire code.  The family of a victim of a porch collapse just reached a settlement for $2.7 million dollars in Chicago.  http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/2931482,CST-NWS-porch1130.article The victim was trying to adjust a chair on the porch when he fell through the rails.  The Sun-Times reported that:

Through evidence discovery and motions, it was learned that almost six months prior to the incident, KMC’s liability insurance carrier warned the company that the large railing gap — 2 feet by 8 feet — should be covered with wire mesh, a release from attorneys said.

By the time of the tragedy, the repairs had not been made.  The public doesn’t really understand how code enforcement saves lives and reduces costs to owners.  A case like this demonstrates its importance.

Weekend Warrior Projects

November 29th, 2010 No comments

What do you do with a person who never quite finishes a building project?  Recently I had an inquiry from a building inspector regarding a situation where the person has obtained building permits on and off for years but has never finished the job.  The neighbors are tired of looking at the unfinished builidng.  It’s not unusual for the excuse in court to be, “I’m busy and can only work at it on the weekends.”  If a reasonable amount of time has gone by without the completion of the work and the permit is due to expire, the building official may wish to add conditions if he or she is going to extend the permit.  If the work still isn’t completed, maybe the permit shouldn’t be extended.  If the permit expires and there are code violations on the property, they are subject to a notice of violation and an order for compliance.  A court might order completion over a specific period of time as a condition of any sentence.  The longer the buiding official allows this type of a situation to continue, the more difficult it will be to obtain compliance.

Categories: Building Codes, Code Enforcement Tags:

Milwaukee Goes After Politician for Code Violations

November 28th, 2010 No comments

Many times I’ve heard tales from code officials as I travel around the country about politicians who have problem properties and who are above the law.  Code officials are in a very difficult position when some of the worst properties are owned by people who vote on their budgets and salaries.  Consequently, it’s refreshing when a story appears about a local government offiicial who is being taken to court for property maintenance issues.  The Journal Sentinel reports that the Milwaukee County Board President is facing court action over five properties he owns including violations for rodent and roach infestation, loose window trim and moldy walls.  http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/110894119.html The city finally filed charges because it was unable to get compliance any other way.

Call the Police

November 26th, 2010 No comments

Sometimes a code violation is so serious that it demands more than the usual citation.  In a recent case in Ontario, Cananda a landlord pleaded guilty to fire code violations after an explosion severely burnt a person in a residence converted to a rooming house. http://www.thebarrieexaminer.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=2860945 The defendant was placed on probation but could have received jail.  We should not forget that in some cases, the situation may cry out for criminal penalties.  In Illinois we have a criminal housing management statute which probably isn’t used as often as it could be.   It’s important for code officials to have a strong working relationship with the local governmental agency’s police department so law enforcement doesn’t hesitate to become involved when it should.  The police are not going to investigate unless a complaint is made and the code official assists the police in understanding how bad the circumstances are.  It is important to deter landlords who try to save money by gambling with tenants’ lives.

30th Anniversary of MGM Fire

November 21st, 2010 No comments

It’s hard to believe that the MGM fire took place 30 years ago today.  My husband and I actually stayed at the hotel prior to the fire and had no idea how unsafe the building was.  There’s a very good article about the problems that caused the loss of 85 lives at http://commandsafety.com/2010/11/1980-mgm-grand-hotel-fire-thirty-years-ago/ When local government officials are debating whether to require fire sprinklers, they need to be reminded about what can happen when they are not present in a high rise.

Categories: Fire Prevention Tags:
Contact Linda: lpiec@sbcglobal.net | 125 W. 2nd St. Hinsdale IL 60521 | Phone: (630) 655-8783
Disclaimer

This blog site is published by and reflects the personal views of Linda Pieczynski, in her individual capacity. It does not necessarily represent the views of her law firm or her clients, and is not sponsored or endorsed by them. The purpose of this blog site is to assist in dissemination of information about legal issues relating to building code enforcement, but no representation is made about the accuracy of the information. The information contained in this blog site is provided only as general information for education purposes, and blog topics may or may not be updated subsequent to their initial posting.

By using this blog site you understand that this information is not provided in the course of an attorney-client relationship and is not intended to constitute legal advice. This blog site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state. This blog site is not intended to be advertising for legal services and Linda Pieczynski does not wish to represent anyone desiring representation based upon viewing this blog site in a state where this blog site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.